LinkedIn Post Templates for B2B

LinkedIn is the highest-leverage social platform for most B2B startups. The organic reach is still extraordinary compared to other platforms — a post from a founder or marketer with 2,000 connections can reach 20,000+ people if it resonates. The business intent of LinkedIn users is unmatched. And the content bar, despite rising fast, is still low enough that genuine expertise stands out.

But LinkedIn has its own grammar. What works on Twitter/X or Instagram often fails here. This guide gives you templates for the formats that consistently perform for B2B companies, plus the principles behind why they work.

The LinkedIn Algorithm in Plain English

Before the templates: understand what LinkedIn actually rewards.

Dwell time over clicks. LinkedIn suppresses posts that send people off-platform. Posts with external links (to your blog, your website) get significantly less distribution than text-only posts or posts where the link is added in the comments. This is why you see "Link in comments →" everywhere.

Comments over likes. Comments signal genuine engagement. Posts that generate discussion get pushed to the commenter's connections' feeds. Engineering for comments (by asking a genuine question, stating something provocative, or ending with a clear invitation to respond) is the most reliable way to increase reach.

Early engagement velocity. The first 60-90 minutes after posting are critical. LinkedIn determines whether to push the post to a broader audience based on early engagement. If possible, reply to every early comment quickly — it extends the engagement window.

Consistent creators get rewarded. Posting 3x/week consistently outperforms posting 10x in one week and then going quiet for two weeks.

---

Template 1: The "Counterintuitive Insight" Post

Best for: Thought leadership, sparking discussion, establishing expertise Expected engagement: High comment rate if the insight is genuinely surprising

Formula:

[Bold, counterintuitive claim — 1 sentence]

[1-2 sentences: Why most people believe the opposite]

[The evidence or reasoning: 3-5 short paragraphs or bullets]

[Nuanced caveat or when conventional wisdom still applies]

[Question to drive comments]

---

Template:

[Counterintuitive statement about your industry or topic]

Most [your audience] believe [conventional wisdom]. Here's why that's wrong:

[Reason 1 — specific, evidence-backed]

[Reason 2 — specific]

[Reason 3 — specific]

[The nuance: when/why the conventional approach still sometimes makes sense]

[Question: "What's your experience with this?" or "Am I wrong here?"]

---

Example:

Publishing less content grew our organic traffic 40%.

Most content teams believe more = more. More posts, more keywords, more traffic.

Here's what we actually found:

We had 200+ posts. 180 of them drove under 50 visits/month. They weren't ranking — they were just competing with each other.

We ran a content audit. Merged 40 overlapping posts. Deleted 30 that were irrelevant. Updated and consolidated the remaining 130.

60 days later: traffic up 40%. Higher-quality traffic. Better keyword rankings on the posts that mattered.

More isn't always more. Sometimes less is the strategy.

What's your experience with content bloat?

---

Template 2: The "I Learned This the Hard Way" Post

Best for: Building trust, driving shares, showing authenticity Expected engagement: High share rate, strong emotional resonance

Formula:

[Hook: state the mistake or hard lesson directly]

[The context: brief situation setup]

[What happened: the specific mistake and its consequences]

[What you know now: the lesson]

[Application: what you'd do differently]

[Optional: CTA to share their own experience]

---

Template:

[The mistake, bluntly stated]

[1-2 sentences: context — when/where/what you were doing]

[2-3 sentences: what happened and why it went wrong]

[The lesson — stated directly, not buried]

Now I [specific behavior change].

[Takeaway for the reader — what they can apply]

What's the most expensive mistake you've made in [domain]?

---

Template 3: The "Numbered Framework" Post

Best for: Educational content, high saves, shares Expected engagement: Saves and shares over comments

Formula:

[Hook: The goal this framework achieves + why it matters]

[Number] [things/steps/principles] for [outcome]:

1. [Step/principle] — [1-2 sentence explanation]
2. [Step/principle] — [1-2 sentence explanation]
...

[Synthesis or closing insight]

[Optional: "Which of these do you struggle with most?"]

---

Template:

[Strong, specific hook — who this is for and what they get]

[N] [frameworks/steps/principles] for [goal]:

1. [Item]: [Brief explanation — 1-2 sentences. Specific, not generic.]

2. [Item]: [Brief explanation]

3. [Item]: [Brief explanation]

4. [Item]: [Brief explanation]

5. [Item]: [Brief explanation]

[Closing synthesis: what ties these together, or the one most important one]

Save this for [when they'll need it].

---

Note on numbered posts: Hooks like "5 things you're doing wrong" or "7 frameworks that changed my thinking" consistently outperform hooks like "Some thoughts on [topic]." Specificity signals substance.

---

Template 4: The "Story + Takeaway" Post

Best for: Authentic connection, driving reach through relatability Expected engagement: Broad reach (shares beyond your immediate network)

Formula:

[Opening line: Drop into the scene — a specific moment]

[The situation: what was happening]

[The twist or tension: what went wrong, what was surprising, what the conflict was]

[The resolution: what happened]

[The takeaway: the transferable lesson]

[The reader application: how does this apply to them?]

---

Template:

[One concrete, specific scene-setting sentence. Not "I was thinking about content marketing" — "I was on my third coffee at 11pm trying to write a blog post for the fifth week in a row."]

[2-3 sentences: the situation — what was at stake, what the constraints were]

[2-3 sentences: what happened — the turn, the realization, the failure, or the unexpected win]

[The lesson: stated plainly]

[1-2 sentences on how you applied this going forward]

[Question or application for the reader]

---

Template 5: The "Curated List" Post

Best for: Getting saves, establishing curation authority, building goodwill Expected engagement: High saves, moderate comments

Formula:

[Hook: What this list will save them time / effort finding]

[N] [resources/tools/examples/companies]:

• [Item] — [1-sentence description of why it made the list]
• [Item] — [Why]
...

[Closing observation about what the list represents]

[Invitation to add their own suggestions]

---

Template:

[N] [resources/examples/tools] for [specific goal] — saving you the [time it took you to find them]:

→ [Item 1] — [Why it's worth knowing about. Specific.]

→ [Item 2] — [Why]

→ [Item 3] — [Why]

→ [Item 4] — [Why]

→ [Item 5] — [Why]

[What pattern these share or why this list matters]

What would you add?

---

Template 6: The "Before / After" Post

Best for: Social proof, demonstrating product value, showing transformation Expected engagement: Good for driving product awareness without hard selling

Formula:

[Before: describe the painful situation]
[After: describe the improved situation]
[What changed: briefly, the mechanism]
[Application for the reader]

---

Template:

Before: [Specific, relatable painful situation your ICP faces — numbers help]

After: [The improved state — specific outcomes, not vague language]

What changed: [The approach, system, or tool — brief]

If you're in the "before" stage right now: [specific actionable advice or invitation to learn more]

---

LinkedIn Formatting Best Practices

The hook is everything

LinkedIn shows ~3 lines before the "see more" break. If those 3 lines don't compel a click, the post fails. Don't bury the most interesting part. Don't start with "I've been thinking about..." Start with the insight, the number, the counterintuitive claim, or the scene.

Line breaks

Short paragraphs separated by blank lines outperform long blocks of text. Each paragraph should be 1-3 sentences. White space makes the post scannable on mobile (where 60%+ of LinkedIn content is consumed).

Length

• Short (50-150 words): Strong hooks, quick takes, punchy commentary. Good for engagement.
• Medium (150-300 words): Most educational frameworks, stories. The sweet spot.
• Long (300-500 words): Deep analysis, detailed stories, comprehensive frameworks. Works when the content warrants it — but readers can always sense padding.

Hashtags

3-5 relevant hashtags. Put them at the end, not inline. They do help distribution marginally — but they don't matter nearly as much as the quality of the content.

Images and videos

Native video dramatically outperforms linked YouTube videos (LinkedIn suppresses links). Single images work well for visual frameworks, stats, and team photos. Carousels (PDF documents) drive very high saves and dwell time — they're one of the best formats on the platform for educational content.

---

Building a LinkedIn Content System

The 1-post-per-week minimum

One well-crafted LinkedIn post per week, every week, for a year, will compound into significant audience growth and brand presence. Most founders who "tried LinkedIn and it didn't work" posted 5 times, saw low engagement, and gave up.

Personal vs. Company page

Personal pages get 5-10x the reach of company pages on LinkedIn. Have your founders and key team members post from their personal accounts — with company account reshares. This is the highest-leverage LinkedIn strategy for startups.

Engage before you broadcast

Comment genuinely on 10-15 posts per day from accounts your ICP follows before you post your own content. This warms the algorithm, builds relationships, and often drives profile visits.

---

Further Reading

• boost your social media engagement
• AI social media engagement strategies for B2B brands
• build your thought leadership on LinkedIn
• Averi's Strategy Map to align your LinkedIn content with your broader brand strategy

Frequently Asked Questions

Should startup founders post personally or through the company page?

Both — but prioritize personal pages. The founder's personal LinkedIn almost always reaches more people than the company page. Have founders post their most high-value content on personal accounts, then reshare to the company page. Use the company page for product announcements, job postings, and content you want to be evergreen and attributable to the company rather than a specific person.

How long does it take to build a LinkedIn audience?

With consistent quality posting (3x/week), most B2B founders see meaningful follower growth within 3-6 months. The first 500 followers are the hardest; once you hit 1,000 meaningful followers, reach starts compounding as your posts get amplified through their networks. Engagement is more important than follower count — 500 highly engaged followers in your ICP are worth more than 10,000 passive ones.

What topics perform best for B2B SaaS companies on LinkedIn?

Specific, counterintuitive business insights outperform everything else. Behind-the-scenes content (revenue numbers, experiments, failures) performs very well when authentic. Tactical frameworks with specific steps do well. The weakest category: generic "5 tips for productivity" content that could have been written by anyone. Anything that feels like it came from a committee rather than a person underperforms.

How do I repurpose blog content for LinkedIn?

Don't just paste a blog post summary. Extract the most counterintuitive insight from the post and build a LinkedIn post around that single idea. Or take the framework from a how-to post and write it as a numbered LinkedIn post. The blog post and the LinkedIn post should share a topic but not feel like the same piece of content — each platform requires its own format.

What's the ideal time to post on LinkedIn?

Tuesday–Thursday between 8-10am or 12-2pm in your target audience's time zone. The first 90 minutes of engagement determine whether LinkedIn amplifies the post further. Avoid Friday afternoons (lowest engagement) and very early mornings (most people check LinkedIn mid-morning, not at 6am). Test your specific audience — analytics will show you your own peak engagement windows once you have 10+ posts to compare.